Wednesday, May 7, 2008

What? Is this a new post I "C"?

an you believe it? A new post indeed. Today I would like to address the status of the letter "c". As a linguist-in-training I reserve the right to be completely obsessed with language and its orthographic representations, the alphabet in the case of English, so today I will ramble on about the letter that resides as the third letter in our alphabet but yet is one of the most unstable and unreliable letters in the alphabet. While most of the letters in the alphabet represent one instance of sound in all places, take the reliable "p" for instance, "c" may represent 5 different sounds:
1. It is pronounced as a "k" sound. The hard "c", if you will, like in the word 'cake' and 'cookie' and Cookie Monster eating cake.
2. "c" becomes "s" before the vowels e, i, y. This is the so-called "soft c"
3. "c" may form an alliance with "h" as in the word 'cheese'.
4. "c" also has the tendency to become a "sh" before "e" or "i" such as in 'ocean' or in some borrowings from French such as 'champagne'.
5. "c" may also be silent, such as in 'muscle'.
Many of the problems that arise in the unreliability of "c" come from its unstable origins. In early Latin the letter "c" consistently was pronounced with the "k"-like pronunciation. However, this clarity was short lived. By about 400 B.C, a sound change had diffused through Latin where the hard "c" sound became what we know as the "ch" sound before high front vowels, e, i, and y, a process called affrication. Thus giving us 2 varieties of "c", one like "k" and one like "ch". In some languages, such as French, this process of weakening continued until "c" was pronounced as a soft "c" or "s" sound. English imported all of this variety of "c" usage, giving "c" such a diverse pronunciation.
The problem of "c"'s ambiguity has not escaped linguists throughout the history of English. Many people have sought to resolve the problem that "c" presents in the English language, some giving it the harsh fate of banishment from English. During the Early Modern English period (1500-1800 A.D.) John Hart wanted to reform the spelling of English. The image above is an example of John Hart's proposed spelling reform for English from his book An Orthographie published 1569. Notice how 'k' replaces 'c' in the word "come" spelled by Hart as "kum". Hart wanted "c" to remain only to represent the sound "ch", and for the other symbols "k" and "s" to take over the places where "c" is used to represent these sounds. Not at all a bad idea in my estimation. However, like any spelling reformation the costs of such a project would be almost insurmountable, not to mention that the whole process would be extremely confusing. So, instead of jumping one the spelling reform bandwagon I think I will remain content to leave the status of "c" as is. As long as I get to complain about how stupid it is.

4 comments:

Timothy Braun said...

Huzah! A new post!
Thank-you for enlightening us with your linguistic wisdom. All I ever wanted to know about "c" (aside from "was it always pronounced 'see' or was it ever 'kee'?") is right before my eyes.

I can't wait for your five part (or possibly six) series on vowels... hint, hint.

Lisa Sawatzky said...

Well now. That certainly makes me think of cookies. And that song the cookie monster used to sing "'c' is for 'cookie', that's good enough for me!" Oh yeah, the good old days.

No wonder it's so hard for other people to learn English. We can't make up our minds. Spanish is so easy that way, with pronouncing things, because it's all just the way it's spelled. Now if they could just simplify verb conjugations and tenses I'd be set...

Juanita said...

I'm with you. Booooo "c". I'm glad we chose to spell Kaleb with a "K". Now people won't pronounce it "saleb".

Lisa Sawatzky said...

Hey, I managed to get the Hippo video on my blog. You ought to check it out!

 
Heather's Thoughts on Life and Linguistics - Free Blogger Templates - by Templates para novo blogger